In 1983, a groundbreaking decision emerged from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that would significantly influence the United States military's policies towards LGBTQ+ service members. This was the case of Watkins v. United States Army, involving Sergeant Perry Watkins, whose struggle against discrimination would pave the way for future reforms in military policy.

Perry Watkins was an African American and openly gay man who was drafted into the United States Army in 1968. Despite disclosing his sexual orientation on his enlistment paperwork, Watkins was admitted into the Army and served with distinction for nearly 15 years. However, when he sought reenlistment and later a continuation of his military career, he faced significant opposition due to his sexual orientation, under the military's policy banning homosexuals from service. The case of Watkins v. United States Army started when Watkins sued the Army in 1980 after being threatened with discharge. The Army argued that Watkins should be discharged because he was openly gay, despite the fact that they had initially waived this policy when he was first drafted. Watkins argued that this was not only unfair but also discriminatory, as the Army was aware of his sexual orientation from the beginning of his service.

The legal battle culminated in 1983 when the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals made a historic ruling in favor of Watkins. The court declared that the Army could not discharge Watkins for his homosexuality, pointing out the inconsistency and discriminatory nature of the Army’s actions. The court's decision emphasized that Watkins had served openly and capably, receiving commendations for his service, and had never been found unfit for duty due to his sexual orientation. This ruling was monumental, as it was one of the first major legal affirmations of rights for homosexual service members in the United States. The Ninth Circuit's decision challenged the prevailing norms of the military and highlighted the contradictions in its policies regarding LGBTQ+ personnel.

The significance of Watkins' case was further underscored in 1991 when The New York Times published an article detailing Watkins' settlement with the U.S. Army. Following his court victory, Watkins negotiated a settlement that allowed him not only to receive a retroactive promotion but also nearly $135,000 in back pay. Most importantly, he was granted an honorable discharge under the terms that acknowledged his years of service without marking him unfavorably due to his sexual orientation. Perry Watkins' legal battle and subsequent victory marked a critical turning point in the fight against discrimination within the U.S. military. It exposed the deep-seated prejudices and the need for a consistent and fair policy towards LGBTQ+ soldiers. Watkins' perseverance and the court's ruling laid the groundwork for challenging the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy that would later be implemented in the 1990s and eventually led to its repeal in 2010.

Watkins' case is not just a story of personal triumph but a powerful example of how individual courage can lead to widespread social change. His fight against the U.S. Army showcased the glaring injustices faced by LGBTQ+ individuals in the military and contributed significantly to the ongoing struggle for equality and rights within the armed forces. Today, Perry Watkins' legacy is remembered as a cornerstone of LGBTQ+ military history. His case, Watkins v. United States Army, serves as a testament to the enduring fight for justice and equality, demonstrating how the actions of one individual can inspire change and lead to greater protections for all.

‍